Raiders Set to Challenge Payton

Right there – in a nutshell – is the game.  It’s the Raiders against Payton Manning.  It’s not about the Indianapolis Colts.  It’s not that you worry the Colt’s will beat you.  It’s what Payton Manning will do against your team.

The Colts go the way of Manning.  If he has a great game, the Colts are uplifted, and they can be a dangerous team. 

Manning has two wins in a row (Tennessee, and Jacksonville), and in those two games he has thrown 4 touchdowns with 548 yards, and most importantly, had no interceptions.  Prior to those two games, Manning had three losses, and it’s easy to point to the fact that he threw 10 interceptions in those games as being the central reason for those losses.

Manning is always dangerous.  In two of the three losses the Colts scored 28 and 35 points.  The only game they were held to under 20 points in that streak was 17 points against San Diego.

There really is only one way to stop Payton Manning, and that is get in his face and harass him all day long. 

But that’s not so easy.

Manning is well known for his play calling at the line of scrimmage.  He waits to see what the defense is giving him, and has been known to call three plays at the line base on what adjustments he sees the defense make. 

In the end, what matters will be the Raiders beating the Colts offensive line to make Manning’s day a bad one, no matter what he does.

Keeping Manning off the field is helpful, but not a certain method to defeat the Colts.  Ask the Miami Dolphins about that. 

Last September the Dolphins kept the ball for 45 minutes against the Colts.  They had 15 first downs out of 21 chances, and ran the ball for 239 yards.   Manning had only 35 plays to work with against 85 for the Dolphins, but . . . that was all he needed.  Manning engineered a drive with 3:50 left in the game, and down 20-24.  Well, I guess you’d call it a drive.  It took him 32 seconds to score the winning touchdown.

The Raiders ought to be able to run the ball against the leagues 28th ranked defense against the run.   Indianapolis ranks 11th against the pass, but the Raiders managed to dominate the NFL’s number one ranked San Diego’s pass defense.

The result the Raiders had against San Diego is what should give all Raiders fans hope, because just a few weeks ago, the Chargers held the Colts to 17 points, while putting up 36 points against their defense.

Stick to the formula – rush and pressure Manning on defense, and run over the Colts defense –a good day from our defensive backs - and I think the Raiders pull of this win in the Oakland Coliseum tomorrow.

---

Photo Credits:
All photos from the Raiders website

Raiders to Rebound Against Denver

Last week was a tough loss against a pretty good team. The Raiders had done what they needed to do in order to win, even after letting Jacksonville back in the game. Pulling out a tie with 3:40 left in the fourth quarter, it felt like they would get the ball back, and get the chance to put it away right at the end of the game.

Jason Campbell had a great day - his best yet for the Raiders. I mentioned last week that the audible seemed to be non-existent, but Campbell had three audibles in the game, and one was for a touchdown. Campbell showed true leadership throughout the game, and the comfort to override plays that came in from the coach, based on what he saw the defense doing.

It all speaks well for the future.

Today, the Raiders take on the Denver Broncos in Oakland. I hate to be a broken record - you may well take me to task for it - but . . . the Raiders can beat anybody - and I mean anybody - if they do what it takes to get the running game going and keep it going, and defensively put pressure on the quarterback on every play.

Tom Tebow will start for the Broncos today, and as a reasonably mobile quarterback he will likely be a challenge to contain. Expect at least one big gainer on a 3rd down.

Put pressure on him and frustrate him, and the Raiders should show him how this is not college. He still has a lot to learn.

Today is a great opportunity for the Raiders - an important game on a number of fronts.

• If they win the remaining three games they have a winning record at the end of the season
• Win today, and they are 5-0 in the division, with the chance to sweep against KC
• Keep alive the possibility that they get into the playoffs
• Establish they are in fact better than bad teams - and Denver is a bad team this year

It may be that you are holding your breath in anticipation of the Raiders getting into the playoffs.  That would be fantastic.

But on a realistic front, I would be happy at the end of the season with a winning record.

I would feel an 8-8 record is a solid statement that the Raiders are a team on the move, and are up out of the doldrums of the past seven years - a fantastic season.

But I would be thrilled to see the Raiders sweep the AFC West with a 6-0 record.  How long has it been since we did that?

The Raiders can win today.  I think the Colts Payton Manning can threaten the Raiders with his ability to throw the ball, but we can beat him with pressure.  The Chiefs will be tough, and will certainly be fighting us for a playoff spot, but there is no aspect of their game that we can't stop.

Keep the pressure on the quarterback, run the ball, and the Raiders win!

This has been the best season in years, and I'm lovin' it!

---

Photo Credits:
Photo of Raiders vs Broncos from the Raiders website

And Now for the Repeat!

THAT'S what I'm talking about!

The Raiders took it to San Diego with emphasis!  The pass rush sacked Rivers 4 times, and according to Tom Cable, they hit him another 16 times.

The pressure was awesome.

On offense the Raiders took to the ground.  Again.  Why Hugh Jackson, the Raiders offensive coordinator so totally gave up on that key part of their game, I guess we'll never know.  But it was back, and back with a vengeance.

The Raiders ran the ball down the Chargers throat.  Bush and McFadden ran the ball for a combined 42 attempts.

Now THAT's what I'm talking about.

Can the Raiders take the Jags?

Oh yea.  Just play your game baby!

---

Not Looking Good for the Raiders Today

The Oakland Raiders take on the San Diego Chargers today in Qualcomm stadium. 

It's not been a very nice place for the Raiders to play since 2002, when they got smacked around in the Super Bowl by Jon Gruden's Tampa Bay Bucs.

Unfortunately, I don't hold any conviction that things will be different today.  Of course, on any given day . . .

The past two weeks the Raiders have looked so much more like the team they've been for the past seven years, that it's painful. 

Where was the running game?  Gone.  Where was the play action quick pass?  Gone.  Where was the quick release to beat the rush?  Gone.  Where were the come back pass route?  Gone.  Where was the rush?  Gone.  Where was the creativity on offense?  Gone.

Yes, there were injuries on defense.  Nnamdi was not up to playing last week.  A bad ankle sprain can take months to fully heal, not just a few weeks.  Apparently his is that bad.  And everyone could see our weakness on pass defense when you don't get a rush on the opponent's quarterback.  We played well enough, possibly, to keep it close if the offense could have held on to the ball longer, and put some points on the board.

But that didn't happen.

The one aspect of the Raiders game the past couple of weeks that most disappointed me was the lack of the running game.  The press has rewarded the opponent defense with having stopped the running game, and the Raiders offensive line with being ineffective. 

I point to the offensive coordinator as the primary culprit.  In Pittsburgh the Raiders ran a total of 15 times, and McFadden was given the ball only 10.  Against the Dolphins the Raiders ran a total of 12 times!  That's right - against one of the leagues worst defenses, the Raiders ran only TWELVE times!!  McFadden got the ball on only eight running plays. 

Unbelievable.

With Campbell at the helm, expect an all-out-blitz-kind-of-day from the Chargers. 

It's NOT impossible that the Raiders win today.  But I hate to say it, but I'm afraid it could get really ugly . . .

---

The goal is to reach 6-5

Miami comes to Oakland this Sunday. With both teams at 5-5, it appears they are evenly matched. With Quarterback injuries at Miami, the speculation was that we might face Tyler Thigpen, but the Dolphins list Chad Henne as starting on Sunday.

Henne's not killing the league, not by a long shot, but then, neither are the Raiders quarterbacks. the Dolphins are currently rated 16th overall in the passing game, while the Raiders rank 29th.

Pressure on Henne will continue to be the key in this game for the Raiders defense. Coming off a knee injury, he is likely to be a bit less mobile than he might be otherwise.

The Dolphins have only given up 19 total sacks this year though, and they've faced Tennessee, New England, Pittsburgh, and Baltimore, all of whom can bring a lot of defensive pressure. It's likely their offensive line will be highly protective of their quarterback, and that can be trouble for the Raiders who can cover well as long as the opponent quarterback doesn't have a lot of time to find their receivers.

Namdi Asomugha is expected to be back on the field, but I suspect his ankle will not be at 100%. The good news there is that Brandon Marshall (Dolphins leading receiver) is not flying to Oakland. He is out with a hamstring problem.

The Dolphins have been known the past couple of years, since head coach Tony Sparano arrived, for using the wildcat formation. This year however, it's been more of a passing attack. Sparano has noted that he went to the wildcat because his best players were Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams, and the wildcat allowed them to get both players on the field and into the action. However, Sparano feels that Davone Bess and Brian Hartline have developed into solid receivers, and the trade for Brandon Marshall meant they could open up the passing game, and move away from the wildcat.

This year the Dolphins have passed 55% of the time, and completed about 63% of those.

I would not be surprised to see the Dolphins bring out the running game on Sunday, and for the wildcat to make a reappearance.  Teams continue to think they can run on the Raiders, and with the injury to Henne, they may want to take some heat off him.

Miami's running game is no-where near the Raiders, even with the poor showing against Pittsburgh last week. Both featured running backs for the Raiders have out gained their Dolphin counterparts, and considering the Dolphins defense is 20th against the run, and 4th against the pass, you should expect the ground game to be a top feature for the Raiders on Sunday. 

Darren McFadden has been amazing this season. Last week was not a reasonable measure. As Tom Cable said on Monday, McFadden's yardage stats were in large part due to the fact that he only carried the ball 10 times!

I thought the Raiders use of McFadden last week was one of the weaknesses in the game. The responsibility for that lies with Hue Jackson. He tried to run McFadden inside because the Steelers are so good defending the run outside. It was just sad to see the Raiders give away that part of the game so easily. I take that to mean Jackson couldn't figure out how to get it done with the players he had, so when it didn't work, he gave up.

Of course, once you get 21 points behind, it's kind of hard to tryout your running game, but against the Steelers, that didn't happen until the third quarter. Giving up on the running game for Oakland means you put the game result into the hands of the quarterback - in this case Jason Campbell. He confirmed my opinion of him Sunday, and that is his inability to handle line pressure.

Miami WILL blitz and pressure. They have 29 sacks this year - the Raiders have 29 as well.
So, the Raiders go into the game on Sunday with a quarterback controversy, like it or not. Most folks saw the same thing as I did when Gradkowski came in - quick decisions, snappy passes, dealt better with the pressure, moved the team. Unfortunately he made a horrible pass that killed his first drive inside the red zone as his pass got picked off.

Coach Cable came right out after the game on Sunday, and again on Monday to say Campbell is his starting quarterback . . . even going so far as to say that there was no difference when Gradkowski came in . . .

I don't agree, and am confounded by that statement.

Reports this week from "unnamed sources" said that Gradkowski took most of the snaps this week with the first team offense. That would indicated that he would be the starting quarterback.

Ah, the suspense!

Bottom line on Sunday?

I think it will likely be a tough game. Miami is a good team, having faced teams with 58 wins, to the Raiders who have faced teams with a collective 45 wins. Miami's 5-5 record comes against some very tough opponents.

Defensively, the Raiders will need to continue to pressure the quarterback, and reduce the time Henne has to find receivers and make good throws. I am confident the Raiders will defend the run successfully.

On offense, the running game will is the crucial key to winning the game. Run well, control the clock, and open the passing game. Football 101. McFadden looks to me like the second coming of Marcus Allen. If the Raiders give up on the run, or fail to block effectively, it will likely be a tough day for the offense to score with Jason Campbell carrying the responsibility to win the game.

Can the Raiders do it?

Absolutely.

---

Photo Credits - in order displayed:
All photos from the Oakland Raiders website "2010 Week 11" photo collection
Photos by Tony Gonzales

1. DT John Henderson pressures the Steelers quarterback.
2. RB Michael Bush tries to make a move around the Steelers defense. 
4. K Sebastian Janikowski kicks a field goal out of the hold of P Shane Lechler.

Well Deserved Rest

Having a rest halfway through the season couldn’t come at a better time for the Raiders.  Their injuries to top players Zach Miller, Nnamdi Asomugha, Bruce Gradkowski, Chaz Schilens, Louis Murphy, and Samson Satele have a chance to heal without having to hold them out of a game.

Reports indicate that Gradkowski  is really ready to play, though it sounds like Cable is having second thoughts about making a change with three straight wins under Campbell’s belt. 

Chaz Schilens took to the field earlier this week, and the press had a look at him doing what is necessary to show he’s ready to play.  It’s likely though, that he will get only limited play in Pittsburgh, if he gets any at all, since he has missed so much practice.  “I’m getting excited” coach Cable said this past Wednesday.  “Next week we have a chance to get him back in uniform and start to work . . . he gives us another playmaker.”

Zach Miller and Nnamdi Asomugha both stayed in the area to receive treatments, along with other players who received injuries last weekend.  The rest of the players were given time off to go “home” to visit friends and family.  Cable said both players were “improving” but would have to see how they look on Monday.  Having had two sons who played soccer, and one who struggled with ankle injury, I know that some ankle injuries can take a month or more before the pain and swelling goes away.  Hopefully neither of their injuries are bad enough to force extended absence from play.

Louis Murphy is expected to be ready to go against Pittsburgh.  He worked out with the team on Tuesday.  Tyvon Branch and Rolando McClain also worked out with the team.  All three are expected to be ready for the Steelers.

Great Showing Against KC

The Raiders put it out on the table for everyone to see - they are NOT the same old Raiders.  I said I thought they could stop the running game of the Chiefs, and prove they are solid against the run.  Anyone who watched that game ought to know it now as well.  Too many of the "expert" reporters just look at the overall stats without diving into the play-by-play figures which show that in nearly every game the Raiders game up ground yards, there were one or two big plays that accounted for most of those yards.  The Raiders Richard Seymour pointed that out in an interview this week, letting everyone know that the defensive line knows how good they are.

The Raiders played every second of every down.  They put terrific pressure on Matt Cassel, brining him down three times for sacks, and one interception. 

There were a lot of individual efforts that can be called out, but none more important that Jacoby Ford's play in the second half.  His touchdown run on the second half opening kickoff was masterful, working behind excellent blocking he read it perfectly, juked one  time and burst through the gap. 

Ford's catch with 11:28 left in the game that setup a field goal was critical in setting up the tie at the end of the game - without it, the Raiders need a touchdown at the end.  Then, with just :24 seconds left in the game, Ford snags the ball out of the hands of KC defender Brandon Flowers, and instead of a game ending interception, the Raiders get setup for the field goal to tie the game forcing overtime.

But Ford wasn't done.  On the Raiders first play of overtime, Campbell heaves the ball downfield, and Ford, with outstretched arms makes the catch with his hands and brings it into his body as he falls to the ground at the KC 15 yard line. 

What a play!

Janikowski got his chance to prove he is the go-to guy twice in this game with clutch kicks to tie it up, and win it.

Bad Showing

I have found myself saying it more than once - you can only play against one other team on the field.  There are three.  You simply cannot play against the officials.  Nothing you can do about it.  You get a flag to throw for play review, but as proven when the KC touchdown was awarded at the start of the second quarter, it helps, but it doesn't always help.  The view that showed Verran Tucker did not get his right foot down before his knee landing out-of-bounds was apparently not shown to referee Jeff Triplett when he reviewed the call!  What? 

The touchdown was setup in the first place by a horrible interference call against Chris Johnson, AND after having a subsequent touchdown called back after review just two plays before. 

The turnover to KC that setup their go-ahead touchdown in the fourth quarter was also questionable.  In the stadium, on the big screen, they showed a view that seemed pretty clear his knee hit before the ball started to slide out.  It was close for sure, but the call made it a game changer, and I question how the heck they made the call.  On tape of Cable talking to Triplett about the call, Cable asks how he could make that call when two officials had ruled him down already.  Triplett says he had to make the call based on what he was told . . .  In other words, he did not see it himself, and he made the choice to impact the outcome of the game.  Let's not forget that a Raider came out of the pile with the ball.

Why was Triplett even on the field in that game?  He could barely run!  He looked like an old man out there.  It was the most embarrassing display of officiating that I've seen in the NFL.  

There were other awful calls in that game, but I thought Tom Cable summed it up best:  "Really an ugly game in a lot of ways.  I thought, uh - 27 penalties called on two teams, in this league, in a game this big, is, is, unbelievable. "

Shed the Old Ways

But the Raiders shed their old ways that day - perhaps once-and-for-all.  Nothing got in their way of the goal . . . a win . . . a big win. Not the officials.  Not the weather.  Not themselves.  Not even Kansas City.

Watch out Pittsburgh.  

Video
For the win!

---

Photo Credits - in order displayed:

1. Raiders sign at the Oakland Coliseum.  Photo by Lori Sheirich.
2. Scoreboard sign with final game score.  Photo by Lori Sheirich.
3. WR Jacoby Ford returns the kickoff for 94-yards and a touchdown to start the 2nd half. Photo by Tony Gonzales. 
4. Raiders setup winning field goal in overtime.  Photo by Lori Sheirich.
5. K Sebastian Janikowski speaks to the media after beating the Chiefs 23-20 with a field goal in overtime. Photo by Tony Gonzales.

Photos numbered 3 and 5 are from the Oakland Raiders website 2010 Week 9 Photo Collection.

Important Game for the Raiders

Sunday, November 7th, 2010, the Oakland Raiders will play the most important game since their 2002 Super Bowl game against Tampa Bay.

There are three key elements that makes this game so important:

1. It is against the first place team in their division.
2. They will pull even in wins with KC if they win, or fall back two if they loose.
3. They will be 3-0 in division play with three remaining division games, and KC will have four left to play.

These are not the only important factors that contribute to the importance of this game, but they are what will establish the Raiders as a team that has to be reckoned with.  If they win this game the Raiders will be in solid contention for a playoff spot, and on a roll as they go into a badly needed bye week.

There are other meaningful reasons why this is such an important game:

1. From a pride standpoint, it will mark the first time since 2002 that they won three games in a row.
2. They will be over .500 for the first time since 2002 this far into the season.
3. They have attracted a stadium full of fans - the first sellout since Sept. 14, 2009.  Fan interest will soar - possibly even pushing them to sell out the rest of the home games.
4. They have been badgered as a team that is not very good against the run - they can prove otherwise.
5. They can believe - no - everyone can believe - that the Raiders have "turned the corner" and are now a really good football team.
6. They can prove that they have shed  the old "habit" of a looser.

It won't be easy.  Let's take a quick look at some of the challenges they will be facing:

1. KC is currently ranked as the number one rushing offense.
2. KC has TWO running backs that have over 500 yards.
3. Nnamdi Asomugha is unlikely to be able to play having suffered a bad ankle sprain last week.
4. Zach Miller suffered an ankle sprain as well, and could have problems if he is hit low again.
5. The Raiders will be without Louis Murphy who is still their top wide receiver this year after having missed last week's game.
6. KC has only three players listed on their Injury Report, none are reported as "out" for the game.
7. The weather may be bad - it's expected to rain throughout the day.

But there are some significant factors that point to a Raiders win Sunday:

1. The Raiders are 9th over all in defense - KC is 16th.
2. While KC is 1st in rushing offense, the Raiders are 2nd.
3. The Raiders are ranked poorly as a passing offense at 20th - but KC is dead last at 32nd
4. The Raiders pass defense is ranked 5th, while KC is ranked 23rd.
5. KC's run defense is in the 7th spot - but our running game didn't have a problem against San Diego's, ranked #2.
6. The Raiders defensive line has put terrific pressure on quarterbacks the past two games and dominated the line against the run as well.
7. KC's opponents have won 20 games (Raiders opponents have 27 wins), and the three best teams they've played have 13 wins between them - and KC lost two of those games (Indianapolis and Houston).

My interpretation of these facts is that the Raiders ought to win this match-up. 

KC's defense, while good against the run, will not stop the Raiders through all four quarters.   With a passing game that's going reasonably well, the Raiders ought to be able to throw against the Chiefs, and assuming the play action calls will continue, the running game will open up enough to get the job done.  I'm looking for the Raiders to get between 100 - 150 yards, and I believe Hugh Jackson's play calling will beat KC's defensive calls. 

Jason Campbell doesn't handle the pass rush very well, but that doesn't seem to be a great threat, as KC is ranked 19th in sacks.  The Raiders have managed pretty well against the Chargers (2nd), Seattle (8th), and the Rams (6th).  Only the Titans have really mauled the Raiders, and the 49ers pressured well.  If Jason does get pressured, and doesn't handle it well, look for Bruce Gradkowski to come off the bench again.

The Raiders have given up some big numbers on the ground, but when you look at, most of the big runners got close to half their yardage on one big play.  The past couple of weeks the Raiders have done pretty well closing the lanes, and bringing down the RB.  While I don't rule out a big play or two, I don't see the Raiders getting steamrolled on the ground. 

As for KC's passing game - it's not their strength.  Of course, I still don't feel the Raiders pass defense is our strength either, but I have to say, it's looked really good the past couple of weeks.  Routt has played pretty well, Branch has been solid, and Mike Mitchell has played really well.  Of all the games to have Asomugha out, assuming our defensive line continues to pressure as they've been doing . . .

I think they will handle KC and win.

---

Photo Credits - in order displayed:
All photos from the Oakland Raiders website "2010 Week 8" photo collection
Photos by Tony Gonzales

1. LB Rolando McClain tackles Seahawks RB Justin Forsett.
2. WR Darrius Heyward-Bey uses his speed to break away from the defense and run the ball in for a touchdown, while his teammates cheer on the sideline.
3. FB Marcel Reece breaks for the end zone.
4. RB Michael Bush breaks off a 30-yard run.
5. QB Jason Campbell gets ready to throw as G Robert Gallery holds off the defender.
6. Oakland Raiders Raiders Head Coach Tom Cable speaks to the team after a dominant 33-3 win over the Seahawks. 

Bring on Seattle

Sunday's win against the Denver Bronco's was the kind of game Tom Cable has talked about for just about as long as he's been with the Raiders - all three phases of the game played well. It's scary how good they were.

On offense, the run blocking was amazing. I've watched the game four times now (and loved every minute each time!), and slowed nearly every offensive play, and many of the defensive plays, and the run blocking was executed like it was drawn up on the board.

I loved the way the Raiders ran the ball (I bet you did too!). The total control on the ground made the air game better. Just having Darren McFadden's threat was enough to draw the attention of the Denver linebackers right away, as they moved up to the line, and never saw Miller slip behind them for a wide open reception and touchdown with just 4:16 off the clock in the game.

The good news with that play was that Campbell found him, and got the ball there, though the throw was not a particularly good throw.

With three receivers that had over 30 receptions, the Raiders defensive backs could have had a tough day. The best way to help the backs out is to make sure the quarterback doesn't have time, and the pressure from the Raiders defense was outstanding. With four sacks on the day, the Raiders often had Orton under pressure and hurrying his throws.

Chris Johnson and Stanford Routt both had the best days I've seen from them in a long time. I attribute that to the pressure on the quarterback. Without giving the quarterback all day, they both proved they can provide cover. Johnson's interception for the TD on the Bronco's first play was a beauty!

Tomorrow the Seattle Seahawks come to town. We beat them in the preseason, but that really meant nothing. Neither team had very many starters on the field that game, but it was Bruce Gradkowski who started that game, and put away the Seahawks early.

With a 4-2 record the Seahawks look, at face value, like they are doing pretty well. But their play seems to have been pretty inconsistent. The smoked the 49ers in week one 31-6, then GOT smoked 33-14 by the Broncos.

The next week they bounce back and take down the Chargers 27-20, winning the game on a kickoff return with just under seven minutes left in the game. That win was followed by a loss to the Rams - another thumping, 27-3.

A review of the team stats, and having seen parts of their games this season lead me to believe this is a game that the Raiders ought to win. They don't have the same ground threat as the Raiders, and Hasselbeck is not rated any better than Campbell, and their stats look about the same.

Their receivers have better stats than the Raiders, who still struggle to find them with any regularity. The Seahawks Mike Williams is their top receiver with 32 catches for 348 yards, but he is likely to be covered by Asomugha, and ought not to have a big game.

So, like last week, I believe this game will come down to putting pressure on the Quarterback so that Johnson and Routt don't have to cover too long, and the Raiders offensive line providing the protection on the passing game, and continuing to open lanes for the running game.

I really like the Raiders chances of winning this game at home, getting to .500 with a 4-4 record, and setting the tone for week 9, when the Kansas City Chiefs come to town.

All they need to do is to play solid football.

---

Photo Credits - in order displayed:
All photographs from The Oakland Raiders website "2010 Week 7" photo collection
Photos by Tony Gonzales

1. Head Coach Tom Cable congratulates TE Zach Miller as he runs off the field. Photo by Tony Gonzales.
2. TE Zach Miller is wide open for the catch. Photo by Tony Gonzales.
3. DT Desmond Bryant lunges for Broncos QB Kyle Orton as he attempts a pass. Photo by Tony Gonzales.
4. RB Darren McFadden leaps through the chaos for a touchdown. Photo by Tony Gonzales.

Broken Record

I feel a bit like a broken record.  The key area's the Raiders need to improve on is pass defense, and pass protection.  I feel they have proven they can defend the run, but the defense has to be able to get off the field for a rest. 

The horrid string of 3 plays and out that the offense displayed last week against the 49ers is just inexcusable (5 in a row, and 7 out of 8 to finish the game).  Tom Cable said as much, and seemed to point the finger at Campbell.  "We left plays out there.  All we needed to do was to execute."

I agree with that assessment, but the offensive line MUST provide better protection - especially for Campbell it appears.

Chris Johnson, and Stanford Routt on defense - a constant weakness.  Combine that with Tyvon Branch occasional gaff's at safety, and you've got to worry about taking on a Bronco's team that have three receivers with over 30 catches each.

With the perfect opportunity, the Raiders couldn't get two wins in a row.  Can they put away Denver?  I think so.  A lot has to happen well for them. 

Maybe the Raiders can get two division wins in a row.  That would be a huge win. 

Go Raiders!

---

Make it Two!

Last Sunday's game was a paradigm changer for the Raiders.  Instead of finding a way to loose the game as they had done the previous two weeks against the Texans and the Cardinals, the Raiders found a way to win it.

It was close.

Campbell had taken the offense down for the big 7, and the lead.  He did what he needed to do with the drive.  Starting at their own 27 yard line and with 12:00 minutes remaining on the clock, Campbell lead the team in a 14 play, 73 yard scoring drive that took 8:21 off the clock.

Still, there was 3:33 left in the game when the Chargers took their first play from the line of scrimmage. 

It had been an amazing game.  The Raiders had come off the bench in the first quarter and just smashed the Chargers, taking a 12 point lead on back-to-back blocked punts with BOTH blocks resulting in points - 9 in all - on a safety and a touchdown.  Janikowski added three points in between the Charger possessions.  And when the Chargers marched down the field on their next drive, it looked like they would punch it in from the one yard line . . . FUMBLE!  And the Raiders get the ball back with only 2:38 left in the first quarter.

Throughout the game the lead changed hands five times.  And then at the end of the game, that 3:33 seemed like an awful long time.  The Raiders had given up a lot of yards, and it was far from a sure thing.  I'll bet a lot of people in that stadium and at home listening or watching the game were thinking the same thing I was . . . find a way to stop them.  You've GOT to stop them. In the back of your mind . . . Ohhh noooo.

And then . . .  the Chargers took the kickoff from 4 yards deep in their end-zone to their 28 yard line.  Not good.  A 14 yard scramble.  A 13 yard pass.  A couple of stops, some short gains, and then . . . Oh man!  A pass interference call on Chris Johnson, and the Chargers are at the Raiders 23.  Looks like they have found a way to loose another game.  Can't stop them.

Suddenly in this game, the Raiders discover the blitz - the pass rush - and they put pressure on Rivers.  A holding call on San Diego.  More pressure and an incomplete pass.  Then the fumble, and return for a touchdown. 

STILL, the Chargers had the ball with 58 seconds on the clock.  It hadn't taken much longer than that for them to threaten on their last drive.  A two point conversion would still put the game into overtime, and an uncertain outcome.

But it didn't happen.  The Raiders had found a way to win, and on that very last drive they had held.

Two and Three. 

Now the challenge is to win two in a row.  The 49ers are not that different from the Raiders this year.  At 0-5, they were blown out twice, but were within one score to win in the other three.

Cable and Jackson both expect to see a lot of pressure come from an aggressive 49er defense.  That's what I would do.  The Raiders have struggled with their pass protection all season, and especially on the left side.  The coaches have not fixed that problem.

Alex Smith can complete passes.  He has passed for an average of 246 yards per game, with only one game under 200 yards (188 against Atlanta), and he has thrown 6 touchdowns this season.  Interceptions and fumbles have been his achilles heel. 

We know what the Raiders have to do.  Defense has to stop the run.  They are capable of doing that.  I am still mostly concerned about the pass defense.  I've said it before - I would go at Stanford Routt all day.  Chris Johnson is another worry, as he is having perhaps his worst season as a Raider.  Both players are often way off the receiver, or are one to two steps off.  They will make a few plays, but on the whole, I believe they are our greatest weakness. 

And without a pass rush and more blitzing, we just give the quarterback and receivers too much time to get open. 

Offensively, the Raiders number one job has to be pass protection.  They can help the line by running the ball, which has been pretty effective. 

But put all the stats aside.  Put all the talk about rivalry, and what part of the game you need to shut down.  Put aside the need to cut down on penalties.

The Raiders need a win. 

It's been since the 2002 season that the Raiders have put two regular season wins together.  So none of that other stuff really matters.

Just . . . make it two!

---

Photo Credits in order of appearance:

1. Photo by Paul Sheirich. Scoreboard Final Score.
2. Photo from The Oakland Raiders website. Photo by Tony Gonzales.  S Hiram Eugene celebrates his touchdown off of a blocked punt by Brandon Myers
3. Photo by Paul Sheirich.  Fans celebrate extra point - Raiders lead 35-27
4. Photo from The Oakland Raiders website.  Photo by Tony Gonzales.  The team comes together before kickoff.

Just Win Baby . . .

At some point in the first quarter of last weeks Raiders match against the Texans I turned to the ticket holders sitting next to me and commented that I didn't think I had ever seen such a poorly attended home game.  I've attended most Raider games (in Oakland) since 1979.

In fact, I was right.  32,218 - the lowest non-strike home attendance since 1967.

I was really surprised.  After all, the Raiders have made definite strides to becoming a more competitive team.  I felt we had a really good chance to beat a very good Texan's team (see last week's blog), and be sitting at 2-2 going into today's game.  The Raiders did just about everything they needed to do - except win it at the end.

This week the Raiders have a slew of injuries that are likely to cause problems, besides having to deal with the way the Chargers are playing.  Darren McFadden (RB), Michael Bennett (RB), Robert Gallery (RB), Travis Goethel (LB), John Henderson (DT), Thomas Howard (LB), Chaz Shilens (WR). 

Some of these guys we've been playing without already, and have been competitive, and we ought not to miss them any more than we already have.  There are key players that have nagging injuries that have not ruled them out, such as Zach Miller (hip), Bruce Gradkowski (shoulder).

The real issue this week, I believe, is the injuries are starting to tap into the depth of talent on the team.  We are looking at Trevor Scott to play at linebacker, for example.  While he did alright during pre-season in that role, he did watch some big gainers by running backs go right through a gap he ought to have filled.  Most of the offensive line starters are fighting injury as well.

Perhaps I'm naive here, but I am going to the game feeling they can win this game.  My expectations are for an 8-8 season, so I am not too dismayed that they loose some.  So far, only one game was an outright loss - no chance - against the Titans. 

The Raiders have been in the drivers seat at the end of the game the last two weeks.

What concerns me is that the Raiders beat themselves both weeks.  It's what Marty Schottenheimer always said - "The Raiders will find a way to beat themselves."

I can't stand that guy.

Still, I love the way the Raiders have improved.  Today is a big match up with San Diego who stumbled early, but seem to be finding their stride. 

To have four losses this early in the season will be tough.  That 8-8 season?  My concern is that Schottenheimer may be right again.  As much as things change, they remain the same . . .

Just win baby.

---

Raiders Good Enough?

---

Correction: The following incorrectly reports that Darren McFadden instead of Walter McFadden would be out for the game.

---

Tomorrow, Sunday October 3rd, the Oakland Raiders meet the Houston Texans for the 6th time since first playing against each other in 2004.

It hasn't been a very pleasant relationship for the Raiders. In fact, with only one win and four losses to the Texans, there is only one team with a better winning percentage against the Raiders (Baltimore Ravens). They certainly are not strangers to each other.

This will be the first game of the season that the Raiders have really faced a strong opponent. Ranked #4 in offense (total yards), the Texans will go up against the #2 defense (total yards) in the Raiders. But the numbers here are misleading. A good example of how statistics don't match results.

The defense is ranked 2nd based on yard allowed per game. Both pass and run defenses show up pretty good on the books. We've seen the Raiders do a pretty good job against some of the leagues top runners. Remember that against the Rams Johnson, over half of his total yards came on one play.

Nnamdi Asomugha shut down the Cardinals Fitzgerald to just one catch while against him. Unfortunately Fitzgerald's second catch was for a touchdown when the Raiders were in a zone coverage. Still, I like the Raiders approach this year of moving Nnamdi to cover the opponents best receiver regardless of where that receiver lines up.

Unfortunately, the points allowed put the defense at 24th in the league, while the Texans show up as 6th. The Raiders have been giving up 25.3 points per game average, and the Texans have been scoring 25.7.

But enough with the statistics. After just three weeks into the season, those are just indicators, and it is still too early to tell just how good teams are. Here is my gut check on the match tomorrow for the Raiders.

First of all, the Raiders must clean up special teams play tomorrow. No big run backs, and especially no scores. Janikowski needs to find his form. With 5 missed field goals so far this season, it's easy to say his form has gone missing. Granted he missed one at 58 yards, but I'm sure anyone who is following this season's football knows what happened last week at the end of the game. My confidence level here - LOW.

Defense needs to continue to play solid against the run. The line has done a pretty good job. In my opinion it is the linebackers that have missed closing the gaps that have allowed the big gainers. Richard Seymour is questionable with a hamstring injury, but the Raiders have still shown up well without him in the game. My confidence level here - GOOD

Defense against the pass must improve for this game. Andre Johnson is their top receiver, but he has only 255 yards out of 782 passing yards. Nnamdi won't be able to do it all himself. I worry particularly about Stanford Routt, Chris Johnson (who is listed as questionable for the game anyway), and safeties Tyvon Branch and Michael Huff. Both safeties have shown a tendency to get out of position, though Huff has looked pretty good for most of this season. If I were facing the Raiders, I would through nearly every pass against Routt. He makes some good plays, but not enough for my liking. Hopefully the Raiders can bring some pressure and disrupt the passing game, and our linebackers cover well. I think if we get beat, it will be in the air. It won't be against Nnamdi. My confidence level - OPTIMISTIC.

Offense will have a new look. Why? Because McFadden is out. Yep. His hamstring. He showed us his capability, but simply cannot get past the durability issue. We will see Michael Bush tomorrow, and I like what he can do. He just doesn't have the burst speed or the moves.  My confidence level - GOOD

Passing tomorrow is looking shaky as well. Both Murphy and Heyward-Bey have injuries (Murphy - collarbone, Heyward-Bey - groin). We will probably see more Higgins tomorrow. But I still like what we've been doing, I believe Gradkowski should be able to find receivers, so it will be up to the line to provide protection for the passing game, and to continue to open lanes for the run. My confidence level - HIGH

The bottom line? Eliminate mistakes, have a good game against the pass, and the Raiders ought to pull an upset, and be 2-2 on Monday.  My confidence level - GOOD

---

Photo Credits:
All photographs from The Oakland Raiders website 
Nnamdi Asomugha photo from "2010 Week 3" photo collection

The Raiders Adjust

Wow.  A lot has happened with the Raiders in just two weeks of football!

Let me say right off the top, that I still believe this team has the best chance of turning around the loosing record they have established over the past seven seasons. 

The press has made a lot of the quarterback change, and of the fact that Hue Jackson came out on Wednesday and said that he had gone to Tom Cable at half-time and told Cable that he wanted to switch quarterbacks.  The Oakland/East Bay papers wanted to make this out to be a coaching controversy.   When you watch the press conference, which is where the reporters get most of their "news" it's hard to come away with the same conclusion.  Cable and Jackson were on the same page, and Cable made the call to switch.  He could have said no, but he didn't.  Unreported in the paper was Cable's statement that he and Jackson had spoken about making a switch during the game earlier in the week if they weren't seeing the kind of productivity they were looking for.

So they switched to Gradkowski.  Great!  Both Campbell and Gradkowski are talented leaders, but with very different styles.  It appears, from what we saw last year and this, that Gradkowski brings a lot of energy and talent to the field.  The Raiders have three very good QB's, so that's a real plus. 

Gradkowski has demonstrated that he could find the "missing" receivers.  Heyward-Bey and Murphy had each caught only one pass in the first half against the Rams, but both got five (yes, each!) after Gradkowski came in, including finding Murphy for a TD in a Kenny Stabler manner as he threw falling back off his back foot.  He also found the seam with passes to Murphy and tight end Zack Miller.  Nice.

One of the local writers, Monte Poole made the case that Campbell should have been given the start this week because to do otherwise makes Cable look "desperate" to keep his job.  He cited other apparent reasons, but I can only assume he really has no clue about talent, nor does he really pay attention to the sideline action.  The move to Gradkowski could have just as easily come at the beginning of the season, but Campbell hadn't really lost the position - just yet.

Gradkowski, win or loose, has been dynamic on the field.  I have felt like the Raiders had a chance with him in there.  In prior posts, I noted how he exhibited leadership in the huddle and on the sideline.  Against the Rams he was all over talking to players and handing out high-fives and pats on the back.  The Raiders need leaders, and have always responded to the coach or leader who is more energized than stoic.  Remember Gruden?  How about how excited Madden used to get? 

Speaking of Gruden . . . he brought in a guy who wasn't supposed to be a starter.  He brought us a proven backup quarterback.  A journeyman.  In Oakland, all that guy did was win.  Gruden brought him in because he had talent, and he had a fire in his belly.  Rich Gannon was one of the best quarterbacks the Raiders have had, and was certainly a leader. 

Gradkowski may not be a Stabler, or a Gannon, but he has a lot of the same characteristics.  And he was drafted by Jon Gruden.  I suspect Gruden loved that fire in his belly, and recognized that he has talent.  But once you get that label of a "backup quarterback" it's hard to shake.

We'll see what Gradkowski can do.  I believe he now has the best opportunity as a starting quarterback of his career, playing for a team that can win. 

Looking at the offensive line, for a moment, I thought that Daniel Loper had a great game as he filled in for injured Robert Gallery.  With all the other great things that happened last week, the press has largely overlooked his play.  The offensive line is a concern I've had, but I liked the way Loper did not over commit on his blocks (I watched him quite a bit during the game, and on replays of the Titans game).  He was better able to pick up a blitzing linebacker or corner, and to help out either Henderson or Veldheer at the left tackle position if they needed it inside.  He was constantly looking around to lay a block where needed. Loper also seemed to be able to move the defender at the right time, and to the proper side to create a gap for McFadden. Right now if it was up to me, Loper would stay as my starting Guard.  I'd let Gallery heal and see how the team plays with Loper.  If all is good - keep him starting.

McFadden has really stepped into his role, and shown without a doubt that he can play in this league.  I'll still hold onto my worry for his durability, but if he holds up, and the line continues to clear out gaps for him to run through, that ought to open up the passing game.  The Raiders could really have an interesting season.

Week One against the Titans was one of those odd games.  Statistically the Raiders were actually not that awful, but it sure looked it while watching the game.  But take away the big play - 76 yard run for TD by Johnson, the 56 yard pass to Washington (one of three long passes that Chris Johnson couldn't seem to defend that day), and the fumble recovery in the final two minutes of the first quarter that resulted in a field goal, you have a 21-13 game instead of a blow-out, and the stats look better.  Those all seem to be things the Raiders are addressing . . . we'll see how successfully.

There were still a lot of problems - Corner Chris Johnson had an awful game, his worst as a Raider that I recall, and frankly, Gallery and Henderson were both problems on the left, and watching the replay and focusing strictly on the offensive line, I thought Langston Walker really struggled as well (probably should have been at LEAST three holding calls against him).  The left side tightened up in the second half (because Gallery was out?).

The Rams were a team the Raiders should have beaten, and did.  I think they are a team in transition like the Raiders, and they played better than expected.  Stupid mistakes on their part late in the game helped the Raiders hold on to the ball and the win. 

Defensively the Raiders played well against the Rams, and poorly against the Titans.  Nothing earth shaking in that statement.  But they actually did quite well against the Titans Johnson, who ran for 142 yards, but had 76 of those on one run in the first half, had 36 yards on 12 carries the rest of the first half, and had only 30 yards on 14 carries in the second half. 

It would appear the Raiders have the ability to shut down the top runners. 

But the big play continues to haunt them.  My take on that one big run by Johnson was that McClain over played his man and actually pushed him too far outside, and created the gap that Johnson exploited.  The question is - where were the safeties?  This too has been a common problem for the Raiders.  Can they fix it?

So, tomorrow, Sunday the 26th of September the Raiders take on the Arizona Cardinals. 

I think the Raiders have a good chance of being 2-1 on Monday!  Go Bruce!  Go Raiders!

---

Photo Credits:
All photographs "2010 Week 2"  from The Oakland Raiders website
http://www.raiders.com/media-vault/photo-gallery/2010-Week-2/afaf624b-b1de-4a95-a0cb-5b408c8444df

Is there Hope for the Raiders in 2010?

In short – yes.  Definitely.

I attended both Raider preseason home games and as I reported earlier, I was keen to see how the Raiders leadership exhibited that leadership.  We’ve heard the praise, and the promise of being ready to make the leap to contender in past years, only to find the product on the field winds up looking the same as every other year.  Three and out.  Get to the red zone, and stall.  Kick the field goal.  Play calling that leaves you scratching your head.  Plays that seem to have no imagination, or worse, plays that appear to have been designed without consideration to the talent and skills of the players we have!

We’ve seen fast receivers out run the throws.  Throws that out distance the runner.  Quarterbacks that wait until the receiver gets open, and THEN he throws . . . too late! No faith (or ability) in timing plays!   We’ve seen the quarterback have to scramble, and the receiver just float & waive for the ball, or runs with the QB (while covered) instead of come back or move to create space for a pass.

We’ve see the need for one yard, or a half yard, and we run a sweep.  We’ve seen the need for fifteen yards, and we throw a draw underneath for an eight yard gain, or worse.

All too often we’ve been left scratching our heads wondering just what the heck is going on?!

Oh yea, and we’ve found ourselves booing – AT the RAIDERS - something that used to be unheard of in Oakland in those good ol’ days.

Ah, but I have found some glimmer of hope, and I want to share my thoughts and observations with you.

Team
I remember just a few short years ago when JaMarcus Russell came to the Raiders.  While the game was going on (and the Raiders getting hammered) he was laughing and chatting it up with Culpepper, and others.  They’d be watching the crowd, or the Raiderettes, just having a great time.  Many of the other players were hanging out on the bench, not paying attention.  They looked to just be having conversations.  Some players were paying attention to the game pretty much full time, but I felt that there just didn’t seem to be any intensity about the game that was being played.  That attitude started in preseason, and went right on happening during the regular season.  

The team I observed the past two weeks was made over.  Transformed.  Involved.  And for the most part WATCHING THE GAME!  What a concept.

Players appear to be talking about the game when they are on the sideline.  When the offense would come off the field, they would huddle up with their coaches, review the photo’s from upstairs, and all be talking with each other afterwards.  It was apparent they were all engaged, and talking about what they did, or maybe what they could do better.  They were definitely at the office.

In the final preseason game against the Seahawks there were not many starters on the field.  But I saw many of them talking to those who were when they came off the field.

Leadership
Wow.   What a difference in leadership I thought I saw taking place on the field this year.

The quarterback position is pretty amazing.  The Raiders appear to have three quarterbacks who are leaders.  Why do I say that?  Because of the way they involve themselves with their teammates. 

I remember watching Rich Gannon right away in the huddle, talking with the guys, walking up to them and tapping them on the shoulder or chest and having a word with them.  On the sideline I’d watch him walk around to different linemen and have a word with them, and then walk over to running back or a receiver, and chat with that guy for a few minutes.  He clearly was working to make each of them and the team, better.  I thought to myself, “That guy’s a leader.”  I was fortunate enough to be invited to a Raider post game dinner later in the season, and my thought was validated when I noticed Gannon walking the entire room over at the Hilton after the dinner talking with folks at every single table (including ours). 

I can’t say what’s going on at the post game dinner now, but I saw Campbell walking up to and right into the huddle, and start talking to the guys.  I saw him on the sideline walking back and forth to different players, talking with them and being animated – cool, but animated.  And the same thing happened with Gradkowski in the huddle and on the sideline, or after a big play.  To a lesser degree I saw Boller doing it as well, though he did not have as much play time during the two games I was able to attend, so I have a little less on which to base my observations.  But Boller was always involved with the other quarterbacks, and was engaged in conversation often with other offensive players.

Asomugha never played a down against the Seahawks, but he was on the sideline watching the whole game, and I saw him talking to guys on the field, in the huddle during the timeouts, and talking with Johnson, Brown (Steve), Huff, and others on the sideline when they came off.  Good stuff.

Seymour was present on the sideline the whole game as well, and I saw him often on the field during the timeouts as well, talking with the defensive linemen, or talking with them as they came off the field.

And that’s from the players.  The coaches appear to be participating well, and have the players engaged on the sideline.  Not too sure about what’s happened on special teams, but it could be the players rather than the coach.  I like what I see for the most part from Cable as well.  He seems to be letting his assistants coach.  He participates some in the timeout huddles, has a few words on the headset or directly with a coach or some players.  Most of the direct player contact seems to be the “atta boy” type of communication.

Play Calling

I don’t really know what the proper route term is, but in the old days the Raider receivers would often drive off the line and run hard, only to suddenly stop, and come back a few yards and have the ball show up perfectly on time for a reception.  Need 6 yards?  Run 10, stop & drop, get 7 yards and the first down.   Or they would drive up, fake inside, and turn outside and have the ball show up near the sideline.   I’m seeing these kinds of plays again, and I’m thrilled.  They are simple, effective, and we are running them for needed yards.  Oh, and those routes that create space in the middle for the tight-end to run into are nice to see as well!

We’ve also seen the quarterback sneak work pretty effectively.  Don’t know where that play has been for the past 6 or 7 years, but it seems to have been rediscovered here in Oakland. 

Questions Remain
The running game still seems to need help.  Healthy players would be nice!  Bush fractures his thumb at the lower joint, and McFadden . . . well, we haven’t seen really him at all this preseason due to injuries, and he’s been absent much of his career with us so far.  I didn’t really think the plays called for him against the 49ers were that great to show off his talents, but then he did nothing with his chances either.  A hard call, but from what I’ve seen of his durability and his power to break tackles, I have to go with doubt for now.  

I don’t know if the offensive line changes with Walker and Veldheer will make the difference on run blocking or not, but help is needed from the O’line, and a back is needed that can find the gaps quickly and with power.  My gut feel is that we will need to continue to upgrade the offensive line if we really want to win the Division, and definitely if we expect to even go to the Super Bowl.  A good running back  can run like a great one if he has an offensive line that can make the blocks that open the gaps for him.

Receivers seem to be improving.  I have liked what I saw of Heyward-Bey, and I still like Higgins.  He shows up when you give him chances.  Murphy seems to be a bit inconsistent, but again, keep giving him chances.  Will we ever see Schilens again?  I firmly believe the receivers will suddenly improve in 2010, because they have a quarterback that knows how to read the game and deliver the ball to them.  Couple that with better, simple routes, and we have a foundation for success.

Special Teams seemed solid for two weeks, and then seemed porous.  What’s up with that?  All I can say is it makes me nervous when the Raiders have to kick away the ball.

Run defense seemed a bit questionable in the last two games of the preseason, but we were playing around with players and positions, and Seymour was given some time off, so we will have to see who we really are on defense.  My feeling is that we will see a significant improvement, with the occasional long gain as a linebacker misses a gap assignment.  That one long run will spoil the run defense stats, but not the overall effectiveness of the run defense.

Healthy players during the season are always the concern in football.  If the Raiders can stay relatively healthy at their starting positions, and especially with key “star” players, they have a great chance to mark 2010 as the end of the record setting longest run in NFL history of most seasons with 11 or more losses (currently at 7 consecutive seasons), the greatest blot on the Raiders record and mockery to the motto of Pride and Poise.

Yes Virginia, there IS hope for the Raiders in 2010.

---

Photo Credits: In order displayed
1. Raiders Shield - Raiders website wallpapers - http://www.raiders.com/fans/wallpapers.html
2. Raiders vs. Seattle Seahawks Sept. 2, 2010 -  Bleacher Report website - (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images) - http://bleacherreport.com/gallery/Seattle+Seahawks+v+Oakland+Raiders?d=2010-09-02&permalink=oakland-raiders
3. Gradkowski at Aug 24th Practice - Raiders Media Vault - Raiders website - http://www.raiders.com/media-vault/photo-gallery/Aug-24th-Practice/f86ea56c-6a39-4248-8b29-8ecd15e64ce5
4. Tom Cable observes Raiders vs. Seahawks Sept. 2, 2010 - Bleacher Report website - (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images) - http://bleacherreport.com/gallery/Seattle+Seahawks+v+Oakland+Raiders?d=2010-09-02&permalink=oakland-raiders
5. Jason Campbell - Raiders website Roster photo - http://www.raiders.com/team/roster/Jason-Campbell/d759a61c-ea28-46eb-900b-f5fc001be5af